National Weather Service (NWS) High Resolution Rawinsonde Data 1.0 General Description This is one of the upper air data sets developed for the THORPEX Pacific Asian Regional Campaign (T-PARC 2008). This data set includes 2590 high vertical resolution (6-second) MicroArt soundings from the eight National Weather Service (NWS) rawinsonde stations in the T-PARC region (Yap, WCI; Ponape, ECI; Koror, Palau WCI; Chuuk, ECI; Majuro, Marshall Island; Guam, Marianna Island; Hilo, HI; Lihue, HI). The data cover the period from 31 May 2008 to 31 October 2008. The soundings were typically released twice a day (0000 and 1200 UTC). The data are in EOL Sounding Composite format (columnar ascii). 1.1 Data Set Contact Steve Williams NCAR/EOL sfw@ucar.edu 2.0 Detailed Data Description 2.0.1 National Weather Service High-Resolution Sounding Algorithms The detailed description of NWS MicroArt sounding collection and instrumentation is located in NWS (1991). 2.1 Detailed Format Description All upper air soundings were converted to the National Center for Atmospheric Research/Earth Observing Laboratory (NCAR/EOL) Sounding Composite Format (ESC). ESC is a version of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) CLASS format and is an ASCII format consisting of 15 header records for each sounding followed by the data records with associated QC information. Header Records The header records (15 total records) contain data type, project ID, site ID, site location, release time, sonde type, meteorological and wind data processors, and the operator's name and comments. The first five header lines contain information identifying the sounding, and have a rigidly defined form. The following 7 header lines are used for auxiliary information and comments about the sounding, and may vary from dataset to dataset. The last 3 header records contain header information for the data columns. Line 13 holds the field names, line 14 the field units, and line 15 contains dashes ('-' characters) delineating the extent of the field. The five standard header lines are as follows: Line Label (padded to 35 char) Contents 1 Data Type: Description of type and resolution of data. 2 Project ID: ID of weather project. 3 Release Site Type/Site ID: Description of release site. 4 Release Location (lon,lat,alt): Position of release site, in format described below. 5 UTC Release Time (y,m,d,h,m,s): Time of release, in format: yyyy, mm, dd, hh:mm:ss The release location is given as: lon (deg min), lat (deg min), lon (dec. deg), lat (dec. deg), alt (m) Longitude in deg min is in the format: ddd mm.mm'W where ddd is the number of degrees from True North (with leading zeros if necessary), mm.mm is the decimal number of minutes, and W represents W or E for west or east longitude, respectively. Latitude has the same format as longitude, except there are only two digits for degrees and N or S for north/south latitude. The decimal equivalent of longitude and latitude and station elevation follow. The seven non-standard header lines may contain any label and contents. The labels are padded to 35 characters to match the standard header lines. Records for the MicroArt data include the following three non-standard header lines. Line Label (padded to 35 char) Contents 6 Ascension No: 1299 7 Radiosonde Serial Number: 152551614 8 Radiosonde Manufacturer: Vaisala Data Records The data records each contain time from release, pressure, temperature, dew point, relative humidity, U and V wind components, wind speed and direction, ascent rate, balloon position data, altitude, and quality control flags (see the QC code description). Each data line contains 21 fields, separated by spaces, with a total width of 130 characters. The data are right-justified within the fields. All fields have one decimal place of precision, with the exception of latitude and longitude, which have three decimal places of precision. The contents and sizes of the 21 fields that appear in each data record are as follows: Field Format No. Width Parameter Units Missing Value ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 6 F6.1 Time Seconds 9999.0 2 6 F6.1 Pressure Millibars 9999.0 3 5 F5.1 Dry-bulb Temperature Degrees C 999.0 4 5 F5.1 Dew Point Temperature Degrees C 999.0 5 5 F5.1 Relative Humidity Percent 999.0 6 6 F6.1 U Wind Component Meters / Second 9999.0 7 6 F6.1 V Wind Component Meters / Second 9999.0 8 5 F5.1 Wind Speed Meters / Second 999.0 9 5 F5.1 Wind Direction Degrees 999.0 10 5 F5.1 Ascension Rate Meters / Second 999.0 11 8 F8.3 Longitude Degrees 9999.0 12 7 F7.3 Latitude Degrees 999.0 13 5 F5.1 Elevation Angle Degrees 999.0 14 5 F5.1 Azimuth Angle Degrees 999.0 15 7 F7.1 Altitude Meters 99999.0 16 4 F4.1 QC for Pressure Code (see below) 99.0 17 4 F4.1 QC for Temperature Code (see below) 99.0 18 4 F4.1 QC for Humidity Code (see below) 99.0 19 4 F4.1 QC for U Component Code (see below) 99.0 20 4 F4.1 QC for V Component Code (see below) 99.0 21 4 F4.1 QC for Ascension Rate Code (see below) 99.0 Fields 16 through 21 contain the Quality Control information derived at the NCAR Earth Observing Laboratory (NCAR/EOL). Any QC information from the original sounding is replaced by the following EOL codes: Code Description 99.0 Unchecked (QC information is "missing.") ("UNCHECKED") 1.0 Checked, datum seems physically reasonable. ("GOOD") 2.0 Checked, datum seems questionable on physical basis.("MAYBE") 3.0 Checked, datum seems to be in error. ("BAD") 4.0 Checked, datum is interpolated. ("ESTIMATED") 9.0 Checked, datum was missing in original file. ("MISSING") Sample Data The following is a sample record of T-PARC 2008 Sounding Rawinsonde NWS upper air data in EOL ESC format. The data portion is much longer than 80 characters and, therefore, may wrap around to a second line. See section 2.1 for an exact format specification Data Type: National Weather Service Sounding. Project ID: T-PARC_2008 Release Site Type/Site ID: PTR Koror, Palau WCI Release Location (lon,lat,alt): 134 30.00'E, 07 18.00'N, 134.500, 7.300, 30.0 UTC Release Time (y,m,d,h,m,s): 2008, 07, 12, 17:01:00 Ascension No: 1469 Radiosonde Serial Number: 702400709 Radiosonde Manufacturer: Vaisala / / / Nominal Release Time (y,m,d,h,m,s):2008, 07, 12, 18:00:00 Time Press Temp Dewpt RH Ucmp Vcmp spd dir Wcmp Lon Lat Ele Azi Alt Qp Qt Qrh Qu Qv QdZ sec mb C C % m/s m/s m/s deg m/s deg deg deg deg m code code code code code code ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- ------- ----- ----- ------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.0 1006.6 26.7 24.4 87.0 -1.0 -1.2 1.6 39.8 999.0 134.500 7.300 48.5 80.6 30.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 9.0 6.0 1002.0 27.1 23.4 80.0 -1.1 -1.3 1.7 40.2 6.8 134.500 7.300 48.5 80.6 71.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 4.0 4.0 99.0 12.0 998.6 27.1 22.9 78.0 -1.1 -1.5 1.9 36.3 5.0 134.500 7.300 48.5 80.6 101.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 4.0 4.0 99.0 18.0 994.9 27.0 22.4 76.0 -1.2 -1.6 2.0 36.9 5.5 134.500 7.300 60.5 79.7 134.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 4.0 4.0 99.0 24.0 991.5 27.0 22.0 74.0 -1.3 -1.8 2.2 35.8 5.0 134.500 7.300 66.6 84.2 164.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 4.0 4.0 99.0 30.0 988.6 26.8 21.8 74.0 -1.3 -1.9 2.3 34.4 4.3 134.500 7.300 71.1 71.7 190.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 4.0 4.0 99.0 2.2 Data Remarks For the MicroArt station data the use of the raw 6-sec resolution elevation and azimuth angle data to derive the winds sometimes led to large oscillations in wind speed, due to the presence of oscillations in the elevation angle data, particularly at low elevation angles. The general approach to correct this problem was to remove the out-lier radiosonde position data before computing the wind components (Williams et al. 1993). For both the azimuth and elevation angles from 360 sec to the end of the sounding, a ninth order polynomial was fit to the curve. The residuals were calculated and compared to the observed values. The outliers of the residuals were then removed. Then to help correct the more extensive problems at low elevation angles within 10 degrees of the limiting angles (LA) some additional smoothing was applied. If the elevation angle was between (LA + 7.5) and (LA + 10), the new elevation angle was computed with a 2 min linear fit. If the elevation angle was between (LA + 5) and (LA + 7.5), the new elevation angle was computed with a 3 min linear fit. If the elevation angle was less than (LA + 5), the new elevation angle was computed with a 4 min linear fit. If the number of observations with low elevation angles was greater than 20% of the total number of observations for the sounding no frequency smoothing occurred. Then, for the elevation angle only, a finite Fourier analysis was performed on the residuals. Periods from 90-190 sec were removed and those below 30 sec were flattened. Finally, a 2 min second order polynomial was then fit to the position to derive the u and v wind components, except for the beginning and end minute (or 1.5 minutes if over 50 mb) which used a 3 min fit. If there were less than 15% of the total number of points, not counting the beginning or end of the flight, on one side of the point for which the wind value was being computed, a linear fit was used. For further information on this methodology and its changes since Williams et al. (1993) please see Williams, et al. (1998). 2.3 Station List ID SITE STATE COUNTRY LONG LAT ELEV (m) SONDE TYPE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHT Hilo HI US -155.1 19.7 12.0 VIZ B2 PHL Lihue HI US -159.4 22.0 29.0 Vaisala PTY Yap WCI 138.1 9.5 22.0 Vaisala PTP Ponape ECI 158.2 7.0 39.0 Vaisala PTR Koror, Palau WCI 134.5 7.3 30.0 Vaisala PTK Chuuk (Truk) ECI 151.8 7.4 3.0 Vaisala PMK Majuro, Marshall Island 171.3 7.1 4.0 VIZ B2 pgac Guam, Marianna Island 144.8 13.5 75.0 VIZ B2 3.0 Quality Control Processing This dataset underwent an automated QC process. The dataset underwent internal consistency checks which included two types of checks, gross limit checks on all parameters and rate-of-change checks on temperature, pressure and ascension rate. Some further information on the QC processing conducted by EOL can be found in Loehrer et al. (1996) and Loehrer et al. (1998). 3.1 Gross Limit Checks These checks were conducted on each sounding and data were automatically flagged as appropriate. Only the data point under examination was flagged. EOL conducted the following gross limit checks on the T-REX NWS sounding dataset. In the table P = pressure, T = temperature, RH = relative humidity, U = U wind component, V = V wind component, B = bad, and Q = questionable. __________________________________________________________________ Parameter(s) Flag Parameter Gross Limit Check Flagged Applied __________________________________________________________________ Pressure < 0 mb or > 1050 mb P B Altitude < 0 m or > 40000 m P, T, RH Q Temperature < -90C or > 45C T Q Dew Point < -99.9C or > 33C RH Q > Temperature T, RH Q Relative Humidity < 0% or > 100% RH B Wind Speed < 0 m/s or > 100 m/s U, V Q > 150 m/s U, V B U Wind Component < 0 m/s or > 100 m/s U Q > 150 m/s U B V Wind Component < 0 m/s or > 100 m/s V Q > 150 m/s V B Wind Direction < 0 deg or > 360 deg U, V B Ascent Rate < -10 m/s or > 10 m/s P, T, RH Q _________________________________________________________________ 3.2 Vertical Consistency Checks These checks were conducted on each sounding and data were automatically flagged as appropriate. These checks were started at the lowest level of the sounding and compared neighboring 6-sec data points (except at pressures less than 100 mb where 30-sec average values were used. In the case of checks ensuring that the values increased/decreased as expected, only the data point under examination was flagged. However, for the other checks, all of the data points used in the examination were flagged. All items within the table are as previously defined. _____________________________________________________________________ Vertical Consistency Parameter(s) Flag Parameter Check Flagged Applied _____________________________________________________________________ Time decreasing/equal None None Altitude decreasing/equal P, T, RH Q Pressure increasing/equal P, T, RH Q > 1 mb/s or < -1 mb/s P, T, RH Q > 2 mb/s or < -2 mb/s P, T, RH B Temperature < -15 C/km P, T, RH Q < -30 C/km P, T, RH B > 50 C/km (not applied at p < 250mb) P, T, RH Q > 100 C/km (not applied at p < 250mb) P, T, RH B Ascent Rate change of > 3 m/s or < -3 m/s P Q change of > 5 m/s or < -5 m/s P B _____________________________________________________________________ 3.3 Data Quality Notes Majuro - The raw angle data at Majuro occasionally has a sharp change that leads to a spike in the wind speed values. Additionally nine of the soundings have bad angle data (and thus bad wind data) for a large portion of the sounding. One sounding 200807232305 has the winds above ~320 mb constant due to constant angle data. Chuuk has fewer spikes in the angle data and similar amounts of bad angle data for an entire sounding (8 soundings). Additionally, 11 soundings from Chuuk have bad temperature and dewpoint data for substantial segments of the sounding. Ponape does not have the sharp angle change problem. A similar number of soundings (7) have the bad angle problem for substantial segments of the sounding. Two soundings have wind directions of either 180 or 360 due to near constant 0 angle data. Also, two soundings have bad temperature and dew point data for much of the sounding. Koror has one sounding (200806161713) with no useable data. Four soundings have bad temperature and dew point for substantial parts of the sounding. Fourteen soundings have bad winds for a substantial part of the sounding. Two soundings have the sharp angle change problem. Two soundings have very low relative humidity for the entire sounding. Yap has four soundings with bad temperature and dew point for substantial segments of the sounding. One sounding (200808071120) has temperature and dew point that are too high for the entire sounding. Also, seven soundings have bad winds for a substantial part of the sounding. Guam has three soundings with the sharp angle change problem and two soundings with bad winds for a substantial part of the sounding. Lihue 200807102301 has unrealistic temperature and dew point above 400 mb and the winds are also of doubtful quality. Also 200810281101 has temperature and dew point data that are bad for the entire sounding and the winds above 300 mb are also bad. Please utilize the data quality flags in the data files. 4.0 References NWS, 1991: Micro-ART Observation and Rework Programs Technical Document, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C., March 1991. Williams, S. F., C. G. Wade, and C. Morel, 1993: A comparison of high resolution radiosonde winds: 6-second Micro-ART winds versus 10-second CLASS LORAN winds. Preprints, Eighth Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, Anaheim, California, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 60-65. Williams, S. F., S. M. Loehrer, and D. R. Gallant, 1998: Computation of high-resolution National Weather Service rawinsonde winds. Preprints, Tenth Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 387-391.