Summer Microzooplankton in the Bering Sea

Metadata also available as - [Questions & Answers] - [Parseable text] - [DIF]

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Diane K. Stoecker
Originator: Kristen L. Blattner
Publication_Date: Unpublished material
Title: Summer Microzooplankton in the Bering Sea
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: spreadsheet
Description:
Abstract:
MZ grazing on phytoplankton was estimated during the summer cruise (HLY0803) at 21 stations in the SE Bering Sea. Experiments were conducted with water collected from the mixed layer at the depth corresponding to ~50% surface irradiance and then prescreened through a 200 μm mesh. A modified 2-point dilution method (Landry 1993, Strom et al. 2006, Strom & Fredrickson 2008) was used to estimate phytoplankton growth (μ, d-1), MZ grazing (g, d-1) and the fraction of phytoplankton daily production removed by microzooplankton grazing (g/μ). Parallel incubations were run without and with the addition of nutrients to alleviate nutrient limitation in the diluted treatments. Incubations were done on-deck under simulated in situ conditions for ~ 24 h. Chlorophyll (total and <20 μm) was measured as a proxy for phytoplankton biomass. Water samples for the determination of MZ abundance, biomass and composition were collected in association with the dilution experiments and at additional selected stations and preserved with 10% (final concentration) acid Lugol’s solution in amber glass bottles. MZ samples were returned to Horn Point Laboratory for enumeration of > 20 μm MZ (> ~15 μm when fixed with acid Lugol’s) using settling slides and a Nikon Eclipse TE 2000-U inverted microscope. A SPOT v 4.0 RT camera and SPOT diagnostic software were used to record images and to measure cells. In accordance with earlier MZ studies in the Bering Sea, ciliates smaller than 20 μm and mixotrophic dinoflagellates as well heterotrophic dinoflagellates were enumerated.
Purpose:
This project addresses the BSIERP hypothesis that “Climate-induced changes in physical forcing will modify the availability and partitioning of food for all trophic levels through bottom-up processes”. MZ are responsible for most of the grazing on phytoplankton in the sea and are an important link in the food chain between phytoplankton and zooplankton, which are food for zooplanktivorous fish which support top predators. The project contributes to the goals of BSIERP by providing summer data on standing stocks of MZ and their grazing activities. A key goal is to determine how the MZ link in Bering Sea food webs is influenced by climate-induced changes in physical forcing.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20080703
Ending_Date: 20090710
Currentness_Reference: observed
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Description_of_Geographic_Extent: Southeast Bering Sea
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -179.3883
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -163.1383
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 62.2040
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 54.3086
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword:
microzooplankton, phytoplankton, grazing, growth, biomass, composition, abundance
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: IOOS Core Variables
Theme_Keyword: Version 1
Theme_Keyword: Biology
Theme_Keyword: Ocean Color
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: project_number:B55
Theme_Keyword: data_url:<http://data.eol.ucar.edu/codiac/dss/id=245.B55-002>
Theme_Keyword: archive_url:<http://www.eol.ucar.edu/projects/bsierp>
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Bering Sea, Arctic
Taxonomy:
Keywords/Taxon:
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Taxonomic_Keywords: dinoflagellate
Taxonomic_Keywords: myrionecta rubra
Taxonomic_Keywords: oligotrich
Taxonomic_Keywords: choreotrich
Taxonomic_Keywords: tintinnid
Taxonomic_Keywords: ciliate
Taxonomic_Keywords: silicoflagellate
Taxonomic_System:
Classification_System/Authority:
Classification_System_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
ADL S.M., A.G.B Simpson, M.A. Farmer, R.A. Andersen, O.R. Anderson, J.R. Barta, S.S. Bowser, G. Brugerolle et al.
Publication_Date: 2005
Title:
The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
Issue_Identification: 52(5)
Other_Citation_Details: pp. 399-451
Classification_System/Authority:
Classification_System_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Krainer, K.H. and W Foissner
Publication_Date: 1990
Title:
Revision of the genus Askenasia Blochmann, 1895 with proposal of two new species and description of Rhabdoaskenasia minima n.g., n. sp. (Ciliophora, Cyclotrichida)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: J. Protozool
Issue_Identification: 37
Other_Citation_Details: pp. 414-427
Taxonomic_Procedures:
Water samples were obtained using 30 l Niskin bottles. Duplicate samples (250 ml) for MZ were preserved with 10% (final concentration) acid Lugol’s solution in amber glass bottles. MZ samples were returned to Horn Point Laboratory for enumeration of > 20 μm MZ (> ~15 μm when fixed with acid Lugol’s) using settling slides and a Nikon Eclipse TE 2000-U inverted microscope. In our data sheets an “0” indicates <40 cells/liter. A SPOT v 4.0 RT camera and SPOT diagnostic software were used to record images and to measure cells. In accordance with earlier MZ studies in the Bering Sea, ciliates smaller than 20 μm and mixotrophic dinoflagellates as well as heterotrophic dinoflagellates were enumerated. Onboard, we examined “fresh” samples, either live or fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde with transmitted light and epifluorescence microscopy to look for the presence or absence of plastids. Our notes from the cruise facilitated in determination of which ciliates and dinoflagellates were photosynthetic (had chlorophyll fluorescence) and which were strictly heterotrophic (no chlorophyll fluorescence except associated with algae in food vacuoles). Separate data sheets are presented for ciliates, dinoflagellates and “other” microzooplankton.
The ciliate abundance and biomass data are presented in 5 categories. MR= Myionecta rubra (=Mesodinium rubrum). This is a photoautotrophic ciliate which consumes cryptophytes and other small prey. MO=Mixotrophic oligotrichs; these ciliates graze on phytoplankton (usually nanophytoplankton) but have chlorophyll and are also photosynthetic. Only ciliates which we observed to have chlorophyll at sea and which we could recognize as the same species in the Lugol’s fixed samples are included in this category on the data sheets. Thus, it is a minimum estimate of mixotrophic ciliates. OC=Oligotrich and naked choreotrich ciliates (mostly heterotrophs). This category may include a few MO that we were not able to recognize in the Lugol’s samples. The ciliates in the OC category are mostly grazers. TI=Tintinnid ciliates. Other=All other ciliates.
The dinoflagellate abundance and biomass data are presented in 4 categories. PD=plastidic dinoflagellates; these dinoflagellates had chlorophyll and were probably mixotrophic since most photosynthetic dinoflagellates can also graze. THD=thecate heterotrophic dinoflagellates. NTHD=non-thecate heterotrophic dinoflagellates. UNK=Dinoflagellates which we were not able to classify as plastidic or non-plastidic in the Lugol’s fixed samples based on our notes from onboard observations.
The MZ “Other” data includes microzooplankton not identified as ciliates or dinoflagellates. It includes 2 categories. SF=silicoflagellates, OtherHP= other heterotrophic protists.
General_Taxonomic_Coverage:
Dinoflagellates= Dinophyceae (Pasher 1914 in Adl et al. 2005 p. 433)
Oligotrichs= Oligotrichia (Butschll 1887, in Adl et al. 2005 p. 436)
Choreotrichs= Choreotrichia (Small and Lynn 1985, in Adl et al. 2005 p. 436)
Tintinnids= Choreotrichs with a lorica (Adl et al. 2005)
Ciliates= Ciliophora (Doflein 1901 in Adl et al. 2005 p.435)
Silicoflagellates= Dictyochales (Haeckel 1894, in Adl et al. 2005 p.427)
Myrionecta rubra (Lohman 1908, in Jankowski 1976, see Krainer and Foissner 1990)
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Chromista
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subkingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Harosa
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Alveolata
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Myzozoa
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Dinozoa
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Dinoflagellata
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Dinophyceae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ciliophora
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Intramacronucleata
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: None
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Oligotrichea
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
Taxon_Rank_Value: Oligotrichia
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Choreotrichida
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tintinnina
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Spirotrichia
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Spirotrichea
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
Taxon_Rank_Value: Choreotrichia
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rhabdophora
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Litostomatea
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
Taxon_Rank_Value: Haptoria
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyclotrichiida
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Mesodiniidae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Myrionecta
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Myrionecta rubra
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Heterokonta
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ochrophyta
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Phaeista
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Monista
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superclass
Taxon_Rank_Value: Hypogyristia
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Dictyochophyceae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Dictyochales
Access_Constraints:
Access is restricted. Data policy: <http://www.eol.ucar.edu/projects/best/program_management_plan.pdf>
Use_Constraints:
Use is restricted. Data policy: <http://www.eol.ucar.edu/projects/best/program_management_plan.pdf>
Analytical_Tool:
Analytical_Tool_Description:
Biomass Conversion Factors: Protists= pg C=0.216*(um3)0.939,
Dinoflagellates=pg C= 0.76*(um3)0.819
Tool_Access_Information:
Tool_Access_Instructions: Unspecified
Tool_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Menden-Deuer S. and E.J. Lessard
Publication_Date: 2000
Title:
Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Limnol. Oceanogr.
Issue_Identification: 45(3)
Other_Citation_Details: pp. 569-579
Analytical_Tool:
Analytical_Tool_Description:
Biomass Conversion Factors: Ciliates=0.19 pg C/ um3
Tool_Access_Information:
Tool_Access_Instructions: conversion factor for ciliates fixed with 2% acid Lugol’s
Tool_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Putt M. and D.K. Stoecker
Publication_Date: 1989
Title:
An experimentally determined carbon:volume ratio for marine "oligotrichous" ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Limnol. Oceanogr.
Issue_Identification: 34(6)
Other_Citation_Details: pp. 1097-1103
Analytical_Tool:
Analytical_Tool_Description:
Biomass Conversion Factors: Ciliates=0.251 pg C/um3
Tool_Access_Information:
Tool_Access_Instructions:
Conversion factor is based on the Putt & Stoecker 1989 conversion factor, but corrected for greater cell shrinkage in 10% rather than 2 % acid Lugol’s solution, this was the conversion factor of choice for ciliates
Tool_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Stoecker D.K., D.J. Gifford, M. Putt
Publication_Date: 19940721
Title:
Preservation of marine planktonic ciliates: losses and cell shrinkage during fixation
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
Issue_Identification: 110
Other_Citation_Details: pp. 293-299
Analytical_Tool:
Analytical_Tool_Description:
Two Point Dilution Grazing Experiments- used to estimate phytoplankton growth coefficients (μ) and mortality of phytoplankton due to microzooplankton grazing (g)
Tool_Access_Information:
Tool_Access_Instructions:
A modified dilution method, the two-point method, was used because it is more efficient than the original method. Because of the potential for nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth in the SE Bering Sea in summer, 2-point incubations were run without and with added nutrients. In the first 5 experiments both nitrogen and phosphorus were added, but in experiments #6-21 only nitrogen was added. The nitrogen additions were NaNO3 (5 μM N added ) and the phosphorus additions were Na2HPO4 (0.3 μM P added). Addition levels were similar to those used by Strom and Fredrickson (2008) in dilution grazing experiments conducted in the SE Bering Sea during 2004. Strom and Fredrickson (2008) found no difference between N addition as NH4Cl and NaNO3.
For the MZ grazing experiments, water was collected during early morning from the depth corresponding to 50-55% surface irradiance level (determined during an optics cast just previous to the CTD cast to collect water) and gently siphoned (using silicone tubing) from two 30-L Niskin bottles into polycarbonate carboys. All tubing, carboys, filtration cartridges and incubation bottles were cleaned with 10% HCl, and rinsed 3 or more times with de-ionized water, and then rinsed with filtered seawater prior to use (Landry 1993). During siphoning, water from one Niskin was prescreened through a 200 μm Nitex mesh to remove larger zooplankton but still contained phytoplankton and micro- and nanozooplankton (WSW, whole seawater). Filtered seawater (FSW) was prepared from the water in the other Niskin using a 0.2 μm pore size Gelman cartridge filters. Initial sampling included >20 μm MZ (abundance, composition, size and biomass) (samples are still being enumerated) and chlorophyll a as a proxy for phytoplankton biomass (total and <20 μm size fraction). No samples for nanozooplankton were collected although this size fraction contributes to “MZ” grazing in dilution experiments.
Treatments consisted of WSW and diluted whole seawater with and without added nutrients. For each treatment, triplicate 1-L polycarbonate bottles were incubated for ~24h in an on-deck flowing sea water incubator to maintain close to in situ mixed layer water temperatures during the incubation and screened with neutral density screen to achieve ~50% surface irradiance. In the first 4 experiments, 5% WSW was used for the diluted treatment, but, due to low chlorophyll values, we switched to a 20% WSW dilution for the dilution treatment in the remaining experiments. At the end of the ~24 h incubations, samples for size fractionated chlorophyll were taken from each bottle. Chlorophyll samples (duplicates) were filtered onto 25 mm dia GF/F filters using gentle vacuum filtration, stored frozen until extraction in 90% acetone at -20o C for 24 h, and analyzed onboard with a calibrated fluorometer (Turner Designs, TD-700).
The growth rate of phytoplankton was calculated from the average initial value (based on duplicate samples from the WSW or WSW+FSW carboy taken during experimental set up) and final values in each bottle at the end of the incubation. Thus, for each incubation with or without added nutrients, 6 growth rates (3 WSW bottles, 3 diluted bottles) were available and used in a linear regression with dilution factor to estimate the growth coefficient of phytoplankton (μ) (the y-intercept, corresponding to 0% WSW) and the grazing coefficient of microzooplankton on phytoplankton (g) (the slope of the regression equation). The standard error (SE) for each coefficient is given as well as its statistical significance (ns = not significant, p>0.05; * = p<0.05; ** = p<0.01; *** = p<0.001). A positive “ μ” indicates phytoplankton growth in the absence of microzooplankton grazing. A negative “μ” indicates phytoplankton mortality in the absence of microzooplankton grazing. A negative “g” indicates microzooplankton grazing. A positive “g” indicates that mortality of phytoplankton was greater in the diluted than the undiluted treatment.
Because of the potential for nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth in the SE Bering Sea in summer, 2-point incubations were run without and with added nutrients. In the first 5 experiments both nitrogen and phosphorus were added, but in experiments #6-21 only nitrogen was added. The nitrogen additions were NaNO3 (5 μM N added ) and the phosphorus additions were Na2HPO4 (0.3 μM P added). Addition levels were similar to those used by Strom and Fredrickson (2008) in dilution grazing experiments conducted in the SE Bering Sea during 2004. Strom and Fredrickson (2008) found no difference between N addition as NH4Cl and NaNO3.
Tool_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Landry M.L.
Publication_Date: 1993
Title:
Estimating rates of growth and grazing mortality of phytoplankton by the dilution method.
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: book chapter
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Handbook of Aquatic Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology
Issue_Identification: Unspecified
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Boca Raton
Publisher: Lewis
Other_Citation_Details: pp. 715-722

Data_Quality_Information:
Logical_Consistency_Report: Unspecified
Completeness_Report: Unspecified
Lineage:
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Updated metadata record to link to Alaska Marine Information System. Original name: bering sea cruise 2008_stoecker.xml Name for AMIS: B55_Stoecker.xml
Process_Date: 20091020
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Metadata record revised again due to data split. Original filename: B55_Stoecker.xml New filename: B55_Stoecker_uZoop_Grazing.xml
Process_Date: 20091028
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
New data for 2009 was submitted, so the date range was increased. Note: slightly different experiments were performed. In 2008, treatments added nutrients or not. In 2009, several depths were sampled at several stations.
Process_Date: 20100203

Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: National Center for Atmospheric Research
Contact_Person: Earth Observing Laboratory
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 3450 Mitchell Lane
City: Boulder
State_or_Province: CO
Postal_Code: 80301
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 303-497-8154
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: codiac@ucar.edu
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: stott@ucar.edu
Distribution_Liability:
No warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the accuracy or utility of the data, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. It is strongly recommended that careful attention be paid to the contents of the metadata file associated with the data. The NCAR and NPRB shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: XLS
File_Decompression_Technique: No compression applied
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: <http://beringsea.eol.ucar.edu>
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
File_Decompression_Technique: No compression applied
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: <http://beringsea.eol.ucar.edu>
Fees: None

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20090423
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Diane K. Stoecker
Contact_Organization:
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science/Horn Point Laboratory
Contact_Position: P.I.
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing
Address: P.O. Box 775
City: Cambridge
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 21613
Country: U.S.
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 410-221-8407
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: stoecker@hpl.umces.edu
Metadata_Standard_Name:
FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999

This page is <http://www.eol.ucar.edu/projects/bsierp/docs/B55_Stoecker_uZoop_Grazing.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.23 on Tue Mar 25 14:32:19 2014