Find data

Projects

Platforms

Instruments

Keywords

Datasets listed reflect the metadata choices previously made, and the current choices above reflect available metadata from those datasets.

STORM-FEST PAM II Mesonet Data, 1-Minute

Summary

9 PAM II sites were positioned near Seneca KS in the STORM- FEST boundary layer network, also a PAM II was collocated with an ASOS in Topeka KS. Data has not undergone QC, but consists of temperature, barometric pressure, 10 m wind speed/direction, relative humidity and total rainfall at 1 min resolution.

Data access

This dataset is not currently available online. For more information, please email the primary point of contact.

Additional information

Homepage	https://data.eol.ucar.edu/dataset/1.42
Data Quality	final
Versions	1.0 (2011-09-14)
Subscribe	Subscribe to receive email when new or updated data is available.
Related projects	STORM-FEST: USWRP/STORM Fronts Experiment Systems Test
Spatial Type	point
Frequency	1 minute
Language	English
Categories	Surface
Platforms	Mesoscale Meteorological Network - Mesonet Portable Automated Mesonet - PAM Weather Stations
Instruments	Automated Weather System
GCMD Science Keywords	AIR TEMPERATURE DEW POINT TEMPERATURE DEW POINT TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY MIXING RATIO PRECIPITATION AMOUNT PRECIPITATION RATE RELATIVE HUMIDITY SURFACE PRESSURE WIND DIRECTION WIND SPEED Expand keywords
Related links	homepage: STORM-FEST

Temporal coverage

Begin datetime	1992-02-01 00:00:00
End datetime	1992-03-15 23:59:59

Spatial coverage

Map data from IBCSO, IBCAO, and Global Topography.

Maximum (North) Latitude: 40.00, Minimum (South) Latitude: 39.00
Minimum (West) Longitude: -97.00, Maximum (East) Longitude: -95.00

Primary point of contact information

EOL Data Support <datahelp@eol.ucar.edu>

Additional contact information

originator: NCAR/EOL Research Data Program

This material is based upon work supported by the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, a major facility sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation and managed by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. National Science Foundation.