Skip to data content Skip to data search
Earth Observing Laboratory
Field Data Archive

DYNAMO Pibal GTS Resolution Winds L4 Data

Summary

This data set includes GTS resolution wind data for 5205 pilot balloon (pibal) observations from 27 stations in the DYNAMO region. Most of the pibal wind observations are only in the lowest few kilometers of the troposphere and are mostly taken at 06 and 18 UTC. These data were processed and quality controlled by CSU.

Data access

  • ORDER data to made available for download

Additional information

Identifier
Data Quality final
Versions
  • 1.0 (2013-06-21)
Subscribe Subscribe to receive email when new or updated data is available.
Related projects
Spatial Type point
Language English
Categories
Platforms
Instruments
GCMD Science Keywords Expand keywords
Documentation
Related links

Temporal coverage

Begin datetime 2011-10-01 00:00:00
End datetime 2012-03-31 23:59:59

Spatial coverage


Map data from IBCSO, IBCAO, and Global Topography.

Maximum (North) Latitude: 15.48, Minimum (South) Latitude: -12.68
Minimum (West) Longitude: 73.82, Maximum (East) Longitude: 141.92

Primary point of contact information

EOL Data Support <datahelp@eol.ucar.edu>

Additional contact information

Citation

Ciesielski, P. 2013. DYNAMO Pibal GTS Resolution Winds L4 Data. Version 1.0. UCAR/NCAR - Earth Observing Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.26023/H8T5-QMQ8-QP00. Accessed 24 Mar 2025.

Today's date is shown: please replace with the date of your most recent access.

Additional citation styles

The citation text below is from the DataCite Content Resolver service and may take a few seconds to load. The styles and locales are obtained from CrossCite, which also provides a citation formatter. See ReFindit for another alternative. Formatting is not perfect: please verify and edit before use. Today's date is shown: please replace with the date of your most recent access.

Style: Locale:
NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, a major facility sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation and managed by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. National Science Foundation.