Skip to data content Skip to data search
Earth Observing Laboratory
Field Data Archive

COMET CASE 043 storm relative mean radial velocity, 2.40 elevation from DODGE CITY, KS/Dodge City

Project:

Summary

This dataset contains the storm relative mean radial velocity, 2.40 degrees elevation angle (P) data product archived from the DODGE CITY, KS/Dodge City (DDC) radar. Data are archived in the NIDS format.

Data access

  • ORDER data for delivery by FTP

Additional information

Homepage
Subscribe Subscribe to receive email when new or updated data is available.
Related projects
Spatial Type grid
Frequency 5 minute
Language English
Categories
Platforms
Instruments
GCMD Science Keywords Expand keywords
Related links

Temporal coverage

Begin datetime 2002-06-11 00:00:00
End datetime 2002-06-12 23:59:59

Spatial coverage


Map data from IBCSO, IBCAO, and Global Topography.

Maximum (North) Latitude: 39.76, Minimum (South) Latitude: 35.76
Minimum (West) Longitude: -101.97, Maximum (East) Longitude: -97.97

Primary point of contact information

Unidata Support <support@unidata.ucar.edu>

Citation

Unidata Support. 2002. COMET CASE 043 storm relative mean radial velocity, 2.40 elevation from DODGE CITY, KS/Dodge City. Version 1.0. UCAR/NCAR - Earth Observing Laboratory. https://data.eol.ucar.edu/dataset/79.036. Accessed 09 Dec 2024.

Today's date is shown: please replace with the date of your most recent access.

This dataset does not have a DOI. If you plan to cite this dataset, please email us to request a DOI, which will improve the searchability and cross-referencing of the citation.

Ancillary information

Metadata download

Note that your browser may not display the above metadata links, but automatically save them as files in a folder such as "Downloads"

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, a major facility sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation and managed by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. National Science Foundation.